forwardgarden.com Biblio Files: talking about books <$BlogRSDURL$>

Biblio Files: talking about books

Biblio Files is a site for bibliophiles. Please look at the index, and post any feedback you can think of. Comment on posts. If you are interested in writing a review or more for this blog, let me know.
  • INDEX
  • MAIN
  • Monday, January 24, 2005

    Uncle Tungsten
    Memories of a Chemical Boyhood
    by Oliver Sacks
    As a boy, Sacks' interest in chemistry was fueled by his many relatives who were chemists. His mother was the sixteenth of eighteen children, so Sacks had many uncles and aunts around. Two of his uncles ran a company called Tungstalite, which made light bulbs with tungsten wires. One of these uncles, Uncle Dave, was sometimes called Uncle Tungsten. He would show and tell Sacks all about the history of tungsten and lighting. Sacks had his own chemistry lab, in which he spent years copying the expiriments of past chemists and conducting his own projects.
    Here Sacks gives us a history of chemistry, up to around 1920. At least half of the book is spent on the history of chemistry, but a considerable amount of the book is spent on his own life. Footnotes accompany most pages; one footnote says that Sacks may have gotten his fondness for footnotes from Mendeleev. Sacks rarely gives the first names of the chemists he writes about. Towards the end of the book, Sacks gives a scene in which he annoys his father by telling him about chemistry in an uninteresting fashion. Fortunately for us, the rest of the book does not carry a fanatical tone. This book includes an index. A word of warning: you are going to need a dictionary if you want to understand the whole book. Sacks has an erudite tone, and he uses Brittish and American spellings and words.
    Happy reading.

    posted by Jonah  # 10:39 AM
    |
    Comments:
    It's sheer nonsense to say that the reader will need a dictionary to understand any part of Oliver Sack's beautifully written book 'Uncle Tungsten'. His writing is clear and therefore even the parts devoted to the history of chemistry and ideas important to chemistry are easy to understand. The reviewer gives a false impression of the work by implying that it's hard to understand.
     
    How many people know what Tungsten is?
    I stand by my review.
     
    Post a Comment


    Archives

    January 2000   February 2004   March 2004   April 2004   May 2004   June 2004   August 2004   September 2004   October 2004   November 2004   December 2004   January 2005   February 2005   March 2005   April 2005   May 2005   June 2005   July 2005   August 2005   September 2005   October 2005   November 2005   December 2005   January 2006   February 2006   March 2006   April 2006   July 2006   November 2006   February 2007   September 2007   October 2007   February 2008  

    view my guestbook sign my guestbook free guestbook Web Site Counter
    Site Counter Site
Meter

    This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

    Oyez
    Oyez: U.S. Supreme Court Multimedia
    Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com